| Looking back to the history of Zen, we can 
			  see five important Masters who created the causes for the 
			  development of Zazen from a Buddhist practice in a part of what is 
			  today India to a practice that exists now in most parts of the 
			  world: - Bodhidharma brought the practice of 
			  sitting facing the wall from India to China,- Eihei Dogen brought shikantaza, 
			  mushotoku and hishiryo from China to Japan,
 - Taisen Deshimaru spread the practice 
			  of Zazen in Europe,
 - Shunryu Suzuki and Taizan Maezumi did 
			  the same in the US.
 But these Masters created only the causes, 
			  without continuous practice over centuries and teachings that 
			  spoke to those practicing, that dissemination would not have 
			  happened. What causes shall we today create for the 
			  further development of Zen in Europe? To answer this question, I 
			  think it's important to take a more detailed look into what Master 
			  Deshimaru taught: Master Deshimaru's basic teaching was about 
			  Zazen. He taught Zazen to Europeans who were not monastics, but 
			  people living professional lives in a civil society. Knowing that 
			  in Japan the practice of Zazen got almost lost due to the 
			  overwhelming importance of ceremonies in the monasteries, Master 
			  Deshimaru reduced the ceremonies to a minimum and didn't found a 
			  monastery (in contrast to Dogen, Suzuki and Maezumi), instead he 
			  built (together with his disciples) La Gendronnière as a temporary 
			  practice place for hundreds of his disciples from all over Europe. In a time in which nationalistic tendencies 
			  grow all over Europe, the existence of an international sangha is 
			  a legacy more important than ever. The monasterizing and 
			  japanizing of the practice at La Gendronnière is a deplorable 
			  deviation from the vision of Master Deshimaru that also endangers 
			  the continuous existence of an international sangha whose main 
			  reason for existence is the shared practice of Zazen, not the 
			  participation in sophisticated rituals performed by specialised 
			  monastics. Inseparable from the practice of 
			  Zazen is the Bodhisattva-ideal: We practice no to perfection 
			  ourselves (also it's a most welcome side-effect), but our practice 
			  is part of a much larger vision, thatis expressed in the Bodhisattva-vows. 
			  The life of a Bodhisattva is based on the realization that we have 
			  no separate existence, but are a changing part of a web of ever 
			  changing relations. By speaking of 'Bodhisattva-ceremony' instead 
			  of using the Japanese term jukai, Master Deshimaru pointed 
			  directly to the Bodhisattva-ideal. The importance of this ideal 
			  for Master Deshimaru is underlined by the fact, that the Four 
			  Vows, the Heart-Sutra and a dedication were the only texts recited 
			  regularly after the morning- and the evening-zazen. The precepts 
			  given and received during the Bodhisattva-ceremony are concrete 
			  guidelines how to realize the vows in the present moment.
 In a time in which egotism and materialism 
			  risk to destroy not only human societies, but endanger all life on 
			  the planet Earth, acting as a Bodhisattva is of utmost importance. 
			  The Bodhisattva-ceremony gives every practitioner the chance to 
			  publicly commit himself or herself to this way of acting. The 
			  monthly Ryaku fusatsu offers the possibility to renew this 
			  commitment. Zazen is a spiritual practice, not a means 
			  to reduce stress and live in a more relaxed way (this is only 
			  another most welcome side-effect of the practice of Zazen). The 
			  spiritual dimension of Zazen becomes visible in wearing the Kesa 
			  in its form of 5, 7 or 9 bands. The transmission of the Kesa and 
			  the teaching of the way to sew it, is a merit of Master Deshimaru. In a time in which the spiritual 
			  orientation in industrialized and post-industrialized societies is 
			  fading away, wearing the Kesa is an important visible sign that 
			  there is a dimension that goes far beyond the limits of our 
			  individual personalities. I see the practice of Zazen in a 
			  non-monastic and multi-national Sangha, the Bodhisattva-ideal and 
			  the Kesa as the most important parts of Master Deshimaru's legacy. 
			  We have to protect this legacy in our individual practice and in 
			  our practice as sangha. If one of these elements gets lost, our 
			  practice risks to lose (at least parts of) its liberating effect. But to perpetuate the teaching of Master 
			  Deshimaru is not enough, we have to set the causes for further 
			  developments. Let´s be realistic: The practice and 
			  teaching of Zazen has no visible impact in any of today's 
			  societies. If we want the impact to grow, additional steps are 
			  necessary. Most important seems to me the 
			  authorization of many (!) more women as teachers. The teaching of 
			  the dharma will stay incomplete as long as reality is only seen 
			  through male eyes and female experiences are not integrated. At Master Deshimaru's death the disciples 
			  who became his successors were in their mid-thirties to 
			  mid-forties. To recommence the authorization of teachers in this 
			  age-group is necessary: Without confidence in the younger 
			  generation, in its capacity to practice and to teach, Zen in 
			  Europe risks to die of sclerosis. Practicing Zazen, we study with and through 
			  our bodies. But at a time, where different approaches to Buddhism 
			  coexist, it is important for teachers to also have a sound 
			  knowledge of Buddhism, and as Zen-teachers especially of 
			  Zen-Buddhism. Humans are beings capable of asking questions. If 
			  Zen-teachers are not able to answer based on the dharma, people 
			  will turn to Buddhist schools and teachers able to answer their 
			  questions. Therefore qualified studies on different subjects need 
			  to be offered. For a multinational sangha, it is important 
			  to unite not only in the silence of Zazen, but also in the shared 
			  practice of ceremonies. The lingua franca for the texts recited 
			  during ceremonies has to be Sino-Japanese. But for the traditional 
			  texts to really touch the hearts and minds of practitioners it is 
			  important to create translations that can be recited and to recite 
			  them on the local and national level. Solidarity and commitment to social justice 
			  on all levels of society and in international relations seems to 
			  me a consequence of the Bodhisattva-ideal and the precepts. The 
			  sangha should support existing activities and create, if 
			  necessary, own activities to realize a juster society, without 
			  losing the concentration on its foundation: Zazen. Master Deshimaru taught shikantaza, 
			  mushotoku and hishiryo. He put all his energy in the practice of 
			  Zazen and in laying the basis for the development of Zen in 
			  Europe, without being attached to the success of his mission. Not 
			  being attached allows, to be open to what comes up at a certain 
			  moment and work with it. We may have ideas about what will be 
			  helpful for the further development of Zen in Europe, we may try 
			  to set causes for further developments, but let's not forget 
			  shikantaza, mushotoku and hishiryo! 
    |